iPod owners all eventually become subject to a pronoid form of apophenia, in which they become convinced that that the shuffle-play feature can read their minds.
Speech-recognition software users all eventually become subject to the paranoid version of this, in which they become convinced that the software is mocking them.
My father auditioned an early (1992-ish) cut of speech-recognition software intended for medical-transcription use. Whenever witnesses were present, the software interjected the word ‘testicle’ at least once every ten words. When witnesses were absent, this behavior completely disappeared. We eventually had to purge the word ‘testicle’ from the dictionary. Thereafter, if the dictation at hand required use of that particular word, the user was forced to spell it.
The software has improved immeasurably since then, but the curse has not lifted entirely. I have felt the clouds gathering for several days, and I quit today’s dictation session early when I spoke the words ‘pulled taut’ into the headset and the words ‘Pol Pot’ appeared on the monitor.
If mine were a more rational mind, I would doubtless ignore errors like these as statistical anomalies. But I am an engineer, and thus an implicit believer in black magic.